The elastic modulus is a key indicator of stiffness. Polycarbonate (2,200–2,600 MPa) is flexible and impact-resistant, making it ideal for arched structures, canopies, and complex-shaped translucent coverings. Its ability to bend without breaking opens wide design possibilities. Fiberglass (5,500–7,800 MPa), thanks to reinforcement, is 2–3 times stiffer. This property allows creating roofs and canopies with increased sheathing spacing, saving materials and reducing the overall weight of the structure. Thus, the choice is determined by the engineering task: where flexibility is needed, polycarbonate is chosen; where the priority is load-bearing capacity and minimal deflection, fiberglass is preferred.
Ask a question
our specialists
The approach to UV protection is fundamentally different. Polycarbonate is protected by a co-extruded layer — an effective but localized barrier. Its damage leads to rapid degradation of the material in that area. Fiberglass uses a multi-level protection system: UV-resistant resin throughout the mass, surface gelcoat, and barrier film. This combination provides resistance not only to sunlight but also to chemicals, and damage to the top layer does not lead to instant destruction of the entire sheet. The comprehensive approach lays the foundation for a longer service life of fiberglass (25+ years) compared to polycarbonate (15–20 years) under intense insolation conditions.
The choice in favor of fiberglass is driven by its specialized advantages critical for agro-industrial complexes. Its main advantage is creating diffused light that uniformly penetrates deep into the canopy, unlike the directed light of polycarbonate. Such illumination prevents plant burns and stimulates photosynthesis, which directly increases yields. Furthermore, fiberglass is chemically inert to pesticides, fertilizers, and aggressive washing, whereas polycarbonate can become cloudy and crack. Low thermal expansion ensures geometric stability and airtightness of a large greenhouse during temperature fluctuations, making operation more reliable and predictable.
- Strength — composite rebar has tensile strength characteristics 3 times higher than those of A500C class steel rebar.
- Durability — the thermal expansion coefficient of composite rebar is close to that of concrete, which prevents micro-deformations and micro-cracks in the concrete structure, significantly increasing the overall durability of the structure.
- Chemical resistance — composite rebar has high chemical resistance in various aggressive environments; it is not subject to corrosion, which also positively affects durability.
- Lightweight — fiberglass rebar with comparable strength characteristics is 9 times lighter than steel rebar.
- Low thermal conductivity — thanks to low thermal conductivity, no "cold bridges" form in structures, reducing heat loss by up to 34% and consequently — heating costs for the building.
- Ease of installation — rebar rods can be cut from a coil to any required length and fastened with plastic ties or special fixing clips, not just binding wire.
- Ease of transportation and storage — rebar can be coiled, allowing even passenger cars to be used for transport, resulting in significant savings.
Fire resistance of ETIZ Foam Glass is 90 min (180 kg/m³ board).
- Product
- Application:
- Builder:
37 cubic metres of ETIZ® Standard were used. Foam glass thickness — 80 mm.